QumulusAI (QMLS) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Motley Fool Transcribing, The Motley FoolWed, November 11, 2026 at 5:58 AM UTC

0

Image source: The Motley Fool.DATE

Nov. 10, 2026

CALL PARTICIPANTS -

Head of Investor Relations - Zachary Graeve

Chief Executive Officer - Mike Maniscalco

Chief Financial Officer - Scott Krosnowski

TAKEAWAYS -

Revenue -- $14.8 million, representing a 376% increase from the prior year period and more than double the revenue reported in the second quarter.

Compute Power Revenue -- $14.1 million, accounting for 96% of total revenue as the company shifts its focus from cryptocurrency mining to high-performance computing.

Adjusted EBITDA -- $3.7 million, marking the first positive quarter for the company with a 25% margin.

Remaining Performance Obligations -- $515 million, increasing from $173.1 million at June 30 due to a tripling of direct customer compute contracts.

Cumulative Signed Contracts -- $528.7 million, including $352 million in new agreements signed during the third quarter.

Active Capacity -- 8 megawatts, across five colocation sites that are currently energized and billing.

Contracted Capacity -- 5.5 megawatts, including 3.8 megawatts in Atlanta, 0.5 megawatt in South Carolina, and 1.2 megawatts in Denver expected to come online through the second quarter of 2027.

Annualized Revenue per Megawatt -- $19 million to $21 million, an increase from previous estimates of $18 million to $20 million driven by rising market pricing for current generation hardware.

Customer Deposits -- $71 million, which fund a portion of deployment costs and reduced the company's reliance on debt financing during the period.

Operating Cash Flow -- $32 million, turning positive for the quarter due to significant upfront prepayments on multiyear contracts.

Capital Expenditures -- $100 million, primarily focused on the acquisition of GPU servers to support capacity expansion.

Equipment Financing -- $248 million, consisting of debt and finance lease obligations tied to specific customer deployments and amortizing against underlying contracts.

Forward ARR Guidance -- $300 million, which management reaffirmed for year end with $209 million currently under signed contracts.

Net Loss -- $14.4 million, reflecting $32.3 million in noncash gains from the fair value remeasurement of financial instruments.

Depreciation and Amortization -- $14.9 million, representing a $8 million sequential increase as new infrastructure was placed in service.

Atlanta Expansion Rights -- 7 megawatts, held under a right of first offer that could increase the total capacity at the Atlanta site to 10.8 megawatts.

Oklahoma Powered Land -- 17 megawatts, with 10 megawatts currently utilized for legacy mining and 7 megawatts of additional power available for future development.

Listing Fees -- $26.4 million, recorded as a onetime noncash charge for shares issued to professional services providers in connection with the direct listing.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS -

Maniscalco noted that a "credit crunch has certainly put a crunch on the data center capacity in the smaller scale data centers," which has limited the availability of new sites for deployment.

Maniscalco stated that data center owners have occasionally been "a little too aggressive" with cooling and electrical equipment estimates, leading to slight timing shifts in capacity delivery.

QumulusAI, Inc. (NASDAQ:QMLS) reported a sequential doubling of revenue and reached positive adjusted EBITDA for the first period since its July listing. Management indicated that the business model focuses on deploying high-performance computing infrastructure into smaller pockets of existing power to minimize the time between contract signing and revenue generation. The company is transitioning its revenue mix toward compute power, which now accounts for the vast majority of total revenue. Management noted that demand for inference-related compute remains high, particularly as customers deploy increasing numbers of artificial intelligence agents.

Management noted that the next wave of demand is expected to come from artificial intelligence agents, which require more compute per task than standard chat queries.

CEO Maniscalco reported that the company targets existing data centers with smaller pockets of power, typically 2 to 50 megawatts, to achieve faster deployment times.

The company is working to diversify its customer base by adding creditworthy enterprise clients alongside existing artificial intelligence native platforms.

Management reported that customer demand currently exceeds available supply, with two existing clients accounting for $241 million in new contract value during the third quarter.

CFO Krosnowski indicated that the company will evaluate and potentially update its method for providing forward-looking guidance during the fourth quarter report as it looks toward 2027.

CEO Maniscalco noted that data center capacity scarcity has caused some timing shifts, including a slight delay at the Atlanta site where service is now expected in the second quarter of 2027.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY -

MW (Megawatt): A unit of power equal to 1 million watts, used to measure the electricity capacity of data centers.

GPU (Graphics Processing Unit): Specialized hardware designed to accelerate the computational workloads required for artificial intelligence.

ARR (Annualized Recurring Revenue): A financial metric representing the annual value of recurring revenue from current contracts.

RPO (Remaining Performance Obligations): The total amount of contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized as revenue.

Adjusted EBITDA: A non-GAAP profit measure that excludes interest, taxes, depreciation, and other noncash or onetime charges.

Inference: The process of using a trained artificial intelligence model to process data and provide outputs or predictions.

Colocation: A data center model where a company rents space, power, and cooling for its own servers from a third-party provider.

RFS (Ready for Service): The milestone date when a data center site is prepared to begin operating and billing for its capacity.

ROFO (Right of First Offer): A contractual provision giving a party the first opportunity to purchase or lease an asset.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Operator: Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the QumulusAI Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Today's call is being recorded. I will now hand the conference over to Zachary Graeve, Head of Investor Relations. Zachary, please go ahead.

Zachary Graeve: Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to QumulusAI's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today to discuss our results are CEO, Mike Maniscalco; and CFO, Scott Krosnowski. Before we get started, I would like to remind you that our remarks today will include forward-looking statements. These include statements about our strategy, capacity and deployment plans, customer agreement value and expectations, our market and future financial and operational performance. Please be advised that these forward-looking statements are covered under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and that QumulusAI decides to avail itself of the protections of the safe harbor for these statements.

These statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions, and they are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those stated or implied. Those risks are described in today's earnings press release and in our filings with the SEC, including our registration statement on Form S-1 as amended and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Our statements speak as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we may refer to non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the comparable GAAP measures are included in today's earnings press release.

The press release and an accompanying investor presentation are available on our website at investors.qumulusai.com. A replay of this call will also be available there. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Mike.

Michael Maniscalco: Thanks, Zachary, and thank you all for joining us. I'm pleased to report that revenue more than doubled sequentially in the third quarter to $14.8 million. Adjusted EBITDA was positive for the first time and signed customer contracts passed $0.5 billion. Here's the simplest way to read this quarter. We did $3.4 million of revenue in the first quarter. We doubled that in the second to $6.7 million and doubled it again in the third to $14.8 million. Additionally, the remaining performance obligations disclosed in our Q3 10-Q already scheduled another doubling in the fourth quarter. That's our business model working as designed.

We move quickly in the smaller pockets of power and then bring them online in months, not years, allowing us to close the gap between signing and billing faster than most. Our most recent large deployment went from signed contract to full production in under 3 months. At any given moment, we are securing the next block, deploying the last one and billing the ones before, all at once and continuously. I'll cover 3 things today: what we do, where our capacity and demand stand and how we're built for the market we're in. Some of you may be new to the story, so let me take a moment to explain what we do. We deploy GPUs.

We don't build models. We build the compute that powers them. And as models get cheaper, I believe the value shifts to the infrastructure that runs them. Open models now carry nearly 1/5 of enterprise tokens at a fraction of the price, and customers want that running on dedicated capacity they control. So we find pockets of existing power, typically 2 to 50 megawatts, mostly in colocation, and we bring the AI compute in those facilities online in months, not years. We're using today's capacity to meet today's demand while building the pipeline to power what's coming. Our current customers are AI inference platforms and the team is building on them.

And they open every conversation with the same question, when can I be running? In a market that is compute-constrained from the largest providers down to the start-ups, speed is the decision. And the next wave is AI agents doing real work and an agent uses far more compute per task than a chat query. For example, Amazon said its customers deployed twice as many agents in the third quarter as in the prior 3 quarters combined, and physical AI is the wave behind that. So we are distributed for speed now and positioned for inference next, building what our customers need today on the way to the distributed platform, the next generation of workloads will require.

That is why we built this company around hyper speed rather than hyperscale. Let me give you the capacity picture, the way we'll report it from here: active, contracted and powered land. Active capacity, which is energized and billing is 8 megawatts across 5 colocation sites with the final deployments we described in August now complete and billing. Contracted capacity, which is secured, not yet billing is 5.45 megawatts, 3.75 megawatts in metro Atlanta, expected to be ready for service in the second quarter of 2027. 0.5 megawatt in Columbia, South Carolina, ready for service in December, and 1.2 megawatts in Denver, Colorado, which we just signed ready for service in Q1.

Our final takedowns for the year are in late stages of negotiation. And beyond that, we're already working towards the next-generation expansions at a site we're in today. We have a right of first offer on 7 megawatts in Atlanta, which could take that site to 10.75 megawatts. That's 7 megawatts of expansion rights on top of the 13.45 that is active or contracted today. That's expansion we've already lined up at a site we already know. And we are selective about where we go. And when a site proves out, we want first call on the next block of it. These are rights, not obligations, and we'll exercise them when it's right for the business.

But the runway is there and it's ours to take. And for powered land, our long-term lease optionality is our Oklahoma site, where we have 10 megawatts of power active today, running our legacy mining operation and up to 7 megawatts of additional grid power available. That's the supply side. On demand, we signed $352 million of new direct contracts in the third quarter, more than double the second quarter, bringing our 2026 signings to $529 million, including a number of smaller agreements we don't announce individually. Contracts keep getting larger. Deposits keep arriving ahead of delivery and pricing on new generation capacity is rising, not falling.

Our most recent 3-year contracts are generating around $19 million to $21 million of annualized revenue per megawatt, up from the $18 million to $20 million we reported in August. The market is moving in the same direction. Rental rates on 3-generation old H100s are up more than 40% since December. We continue to sell capacity faster than we can energize it. Demand is not our constraint. Capacity is. So let me turn to our sector, where 2 things stood out this earnings season. The first is the capacity we just spoke about. Two weeks ago, Microsoft, Amazon and Google reported earnings. Together, they disclosed about $1.8 trillion in contracted backlog. Microsoft said customer demand continues to exceed available supply.

Google said, it has started running third-party compute because its own is constrained. The largest buyers of compute in the world cannot build fast enough, and it's still early. The Census Bureau counts about 1 in 5 U.S. businesses using AI today. That is the market we sell into. And it's why 2 of our customers came back this quarter for another $241 million in total contract value. The second is the question the market has been asking for the last several weeks. The question investors have asked us since the day we listed. How is the growth financed is now the question being asked of the entire sector and its largest names.

The market spent weeks repricing AI infrastructure companies, their credit first and then their equity. And the worry underneath it is simple, who is paying for the GPUs and what happens to the debt if the customer doesn't show up? So the question has shifted from how large the customer contract is to whether we can deliver, finance and run it at a profit. This quarter, we answered all 3. 8 megawatts completed and billing. Every deployment financed against its own contract and adjusted EBITDA turned positive. Here's how we do it. A customer signs a term take-or-pay contract and puts down a deposit.

That deposit covers the portion of the GPU cost that isn't financed and equipment financing tied to that contract covers the rest. The contract revenue services the financing behind it. We use a mix of loans and leases depending on the terms and overall cost of capital. At the end of the loan, the equipment is paid off free and clear and ours to keep. At the end of a lease, we retain flexibility to acquire the equipment at fair market value with most capped at a relatively small percentage of its original purchase price, preserving significant residual asset value and upside or we simply return the equipment with no further obligation.

Each financing is tied to a deployment, and each deployment to a contract. We have no unsecured bonds. The customer's commitment funds the hardware and the hardware earns the customer's commitment back. That's the model. On the customers themselves, they're mostly AI-native inference platforms growing fast and they pay ahead of delivery. We structure every contract for the credit we take, take-or-pay terms, deposits upfront and remedies if the customer doesn't perform. We're deliberately building towards a mix where a meaningful share of our capacity is anchored by creditworthy enterprise customers alongside of the AI natives. That work is underway, and you'll hear more about it as it lands. Let me pull it all together.

Three months ago, we told you we had 8 megawatts sold with final deployments in process. Those deployments are done and they're billing. Revenue doubled. Adjusted EBITDA turned positive for the first time and the remaining performance obligations disclosed in our Q3 10-Q already schedule another doubling into the fourth quarter. Today, 8 megawatts are active and billing. Nearly 5.5 more are contracted. 7 megawatts of expansion rights sit at a site we are already in with 17 megawatts of powered land in Oklahoma behind them. And we sold every megawatt we've energized before it was turned on. $0.5 billion of signed contracts is a starting point, not a ceiling.

In a market that's repricing scale, we are built on sold, funded capacity delivered in months rather than years. Secure the next block, deploy the last one, bill the ones before it, then do it again. All 3 moved this quarter. They are moving again now, and our conviction in this model has never been stronger. With that, I'll turn it over to Scott to walk through our financial results in greater detail. Scott?

Scott Krosnowski: Thanks, Mike. Good afternoon, everyone. I'll take revenue first, then walk down the income statement, then cash and the balance sheet and finish with our outlook. First, revenue. Third quarter revenue was $14.8 million, up 376% compared to the prior year period and more than double the second quarter of 2026. The growth came from capacity we energized during the quarter, much of which billed for only part of the period. Compute accounted for 96% of revenue, up from 47% in the prior year period. Next, remaining performance obligations.

RPO, direct customer compute contracts signed as of quarter end ended the third quarter at $515 million, nearly 3x the $173.1 million at June 30, with a weighted average term of about 2.5 years. That is the contracted revenue in front of us. Under the terms of those contracts, $29.1 million is scheduled to be recognized in the fourth quarter and the remaining $486 million from 2027 through 2030. Down to the operating line. Operating loss was $41.6 million. That includes a $26.4 million noncash charge for shares issued as a professional services fee in connection with our public listing, a onetime item that is added back in adjusted EBITDA.

Beyond that charge, the loss widened as compared to the second quarter for a favorable reason. Depreciation and amortization was $14.9 million, up $8 million quarter-over-quarter as the capacity Mike described was placed in service. That is the cost of the capacity that doubled revenue. Adjusted EBITDA was $3.7 million, representing a 25% margin in our first positive quarter compared to a loss of $0.8 million in the second quarter and a loss of $0.6 million a year ago. Depreciation and interest are expected to step up again in the fourth quarter with a full period on the equipment placed in service during the quarter.

And stock-based comp will normalize moving forward as the initial issuance of employee and director RSUs, including onetime grants that vested on issuance was recorded in September. And below the operating line, third quarter net loss was $14.4 million or $0.43 per share. That includes $32.3 million of noncash gains from marking our convertible notes, the related option and our warrants to fair value, gains that move inversely with our share price and the $26.4 million noncash charge for shares issued as a professional services fee in connection with our public listing. Net interest expense was $5.4 million, up $3.3 million quarter-over-quarter, driven by equipment financing for deployments placed in service. Turning to cash. Customer prepayments are funding the build.

Contracts signed in the third quarter carried $71 million of customer deposits, more than double the second quarter and deferred revenue rose to $79 million from $30.5 million at June 30. On our major multiyear contracts, we typically require prepayments of 15% to 20% of the total contract value. That money supports the deployment it's attached to and reduces what we need from debt. As a result, operating cash flow was positive $32 million in the quarter. Capital expenditures were approximately $100 million in the quarter, primarily for GPU servers, and we added approximately $94 million of equipment and facilities under new leases with about $194 million placed in service, which drove the step-up in depreciation.

Financing activities provided $44.6 million in Q3, and we ended the quarter with $31.1 million of cash and restricted cash, of which $9.2 million is restricted under our loan agreements. On the balance sheet, total assets were $394.1 million at September 30, up from $215 million at June 30 as equipment was placed in service. Debt and finance lease obligations totaled $248 million. The large majority is equipment financing tied to a specific deployment and amortizing against the underlying contract. In the quarter, we closed a $51.5 million loan and completed the third draw under our USD.AI facility. After quarter end, we expanded our lease financing with TFC to $123.6 million, all without new equity.

Shareholders' equity was $25.3 million at September 30, up from a deficit of $0.8 million at June 30. Finally, turning to our outlook. We are reaffirming the guidance we issued in July for 18 megawatts of year-end contracted capacity and year-end forward ARR of $300 million. We have 8 megawatts active and another 5.45 megawatts under executed agreements, bringing our total footprint to 13.45 megawatts with the balance in late-stage negotiation. About $209 million of forward ARR is under signed contracts today, and we are now marketing our newest capacity.

We are also evaluating how we provide guidance, and we expect to update the way we provide forward guidance when we report the fourth quarter as we look ahead to 2027. With that, I'll hand it back to Mike.

Michael Maniscalco: Thanks, Scott. Let me finish off where I started. The question in our sector has become whether capacity can be delivered, financed and run at a profit. We now have 8 megawatts fully active and billing and 5.5 more under contract. We financed every deployment against its own contract. Our Q3 adjusted EBITDA was positive for the first time and remaining performance obligations in our 10-Q already schedule another sequential doubling of quarterly revenue in the fourth quarter. Step back for a moment. This company listed in July. It went through the hardest stretch the sector has seen in years, and it came out the other side with revenue doubling, contracted revenue tripling and adjusted EBITDA turning positive.

For a company of our size, those are real accomplishments and the team here earned every one of them. And we are still early, early in AI adoption and early in this company's growth. Customer demand and the AI use cases driving it remain extremely strong, and we believe we're incredibly positioned for significant growth ahead. We're just getting started. Moderator, we're ready to take questions.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Michael Donovan with Compass Point.

Michael Donovan: Congrats on the execution. For the 2 B300 agreements signed in September, how much capital is still needed? And then how much is covered by customer prepayments and committed financing? And how do you expect to fund the balance?

Michael Maniscalco: Thanks, Michael. Appreciate it. I will let Scott chime in on that one.

Scott Krosnowski: Michael, the -- one of the orders is fully paid for. And then the other, we did a 20% prepay. Yes, we have a 20% prepay and the balance is in process.

Michael Maniscalco: And on that one, as you -- as we noted, the RFS slipped slightly on that. So we're aligning the timing on that final financing to where the RFS actually lands in the data center capacity coming online.

Michael Donovan: Appreciate that. That's helpful. With the additional 1.2 megawatts in Denver expected to be ready in the first quarter, is that capacity tied to existing customer contracts or new demand?

Advertisement

Scott Krosnowski: The new capacity is that we just signed that's currently being marketed. It is not yet sold.

Michael Maniscalco: And I believe that all of the capacity with the exception of Columbia is being marketed right now.

Michael Donovan: Appreciate that. You mentioned interest from potential customers beyond AI-native platforms. Can you provide more color on the types of customers you're seeing and the workloads they're looking to run?

Michael Maniscalco: Yes. And I think it's important to point the current pockets of power that we're growing into and how those fit the various customers that we're selling and marketing towards. As you know, some of the larger customers want some of the larger footprint. So as we look forward into our pipeline of larger sites, that starts to change the shape of those customers and what they look and feel like. But right now, for the smaller pockets that we have been successfully finding and acquiring that capacity and then marketing it to our customer base, a lot of that is happening within the AI natives. Still a lot of healthy demand there.

But at the same time, we are working the pipeline of the enterprises. They tend to make decisions on different time lines. So we're trying to work and align those time lines appropriately. But to give you an example, the financial services sector is still a pretty hot one for us as we announced the DRW announcement in the last few months here, I think that's a good example of those types of customers. But general enterprise, I mean, it runs the gamut as far as who we're targeting within the segments.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Fedor Shabalin with B. Riley.

Fedor Shabalin: Congrats this quarter, solid and clean progress. And my first question is on probably kind of research nature. Since this neocloud and just related infrastructure stock sell off that followed CoreWeave several weeks ago, have you seen any change in the cadence or maybe even quality of inbound demand for new capacity, maybe just number of RFPs, deal size or maybe like any differ in contract terms? And on pricing, are new B300 inquiries still clearing around the $4.30, something like per GPU hour level of your current recent contracts? Or is the market softening?

Michael Maniscalco: Yes. I'll answer the first part of your question first, and thank you for the questions. So we are continuing to see a very healthy amount of demand and haven't really seen a big shift since last month, one way or the other. What we are seeing is, I think, trying to think the right way to explain it, but a little higher sense of urgency of our existing customers and their desire to lock down capacity because they -- I believe they know the scarcity of that capacity in the market. And I would also say that's pointing towards the stability or even increasing of the GPU per hour pricing and GPU prepayment terms.

So generally speaking, that's what we're seeing in the market right now, that the pricing on the B300s continues to inch up as pricing of everything is continuing to increase slightly. The demand is remaining strong and the terms are improving in our favor currently.

Fedor Shabalin: And just a little follow-up on the Atlanta contract. What's slipped there from early '27 to second quarter 2027? What is it power, colocation provider or maybe hardware delivery? And does this customer's contract start date move with it?

Michael Maniscalco: I might have misunderstood the question, so feel free to ask it if I misspeak here. But I think that the -- what we're seeing right now as far as scarcity is the data center capacity itself. So that is really the biggest driver of the kind of early 2027 growth and potential from a supply chain perspective on the GPUs and associated equipment themselves. We are -- we've done a good job of logistics on preplanning and getting that supply allocated and arranged ahead of time and those orders in ahead of time. So that side of things is a little faster right now. And that's how we're managing the placements. Did I answer your question?

Fedor Shabalin: Yes, partially -- yes, but just -- maybe just like to frame it shortly, what was the reason of this timing shift?

Michael Maniscalco: Yes, I can speak to that. I mean there's -- when the timing is shifting, it's usually a number of factors. And just speaking more generally about all the capacity out in the market, sometimes it's the supply chain on the data center owner-operator side of things where they estimated around all of cooling or electrical equipment and maybe we're just a little too aggressive. So we're trying to do a better job of giving buffers there. As you have heard on these, we're also narrowing in a little more on quarters than months so that we have that flexibility given the supply chain is just so dynamic right now.

And then we're also, as I think I've mentioned on some of these calls and on conversations with the market, the way we've been finding this data center capacity has been generally going back to existing data centers. Oftentimes, these are legacy data centers. And oftentimes, those legacy data centers have existing tenants. So a few things need to happen. The tenant -- the existing tenant needs to have a proper vacation date and move out on time. And then the data center owner-operator needs enough time in between that window to retrofit and renovate to accommodate the GPU servers rather than some of the legacy equipment that was in there with the tenant that's vacating.

And then they're also -- they have to arrange the financing and move that through. So there are several different levers that have to move to hit these dates. And what you're seeing with some of these delays is just slight shifts in some of those levers.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Bill Papanastasiou with Chardan Capital Markets.

Bill Papanastasiou: Congrats on a strong quarter. For the first one, I was hoping you'd be able to share a boots-on-the-ground perspective of the supply-demand environment for data center colo capacity and how you expect it to evolve. I'm curious, in particular, if you're seeing the same level of availability for the sub-5-megawatt colo opportunities? Or are you seeing that dynamic shift at all given the continued regulatory headwinds that are bringing pressures on larger sites? I guess long-winded question of, do you expect to see new entrants seek out smaller scale deployments given what we're seeing on the regulatory front?

Michael Maniscalco: No, it's a great question, and thank you for the question, Bill. I would say that it's not necessarily getting more competitive for that space. And a lot of these smaller pockets that we have been moving into because they're existing, haven't necessarily been impacted by some of the headwinds facing the data center market. I will say some of the bigger sites that we're eyeing into the future may be impacted a little more greatly by that. But that's factored into later into '28 and late half of '27 right now. And that's something we're thinking through -- as we're thinking through our options for growth. But I think there's a few different points I want to make here.

The -- we have found success looking for even smaller pockets of power. And I think that the Columbia, South Carolina site is a great example of that. So we're continuing to be very flexible and opportunistic of where we're finding pockets of power because the 500 kW site accommodates roughly 32 GPU nodes, which is a healthy and marketable footprint for a lot of our inference customers. So it's still a very marketable pocket of compute and power that we can sell to our customer base.

And it also is still somewhat significant to our revenue and that if we can monetize that at the $20 million round number, that's still $10 million of potential revenue, and we can replicate that at several sites and bring that online quickly. So it fits our model really well. So that's one thing we're doing. The other side of things is the credit crunch has certainly put a crunch on the data center capacity in the smaller scale data centers. I think that's been more impactful than, say, a lack of supply.

But right now, it feels like that was a broad stroke overreaction by some of those data center owner-operators and investors, and we are watching closely to see if that loosens up. And to give you a little more specificity there, some of those smaller colocation pockets made a pretty fast adjustment to say that they do not want to sell to non-IG in those instances. And as you know, some -- most of the IG customers are looking for much bigger pockets than a megawatt or 2 here or there. So I think they're going to see that problem pretty quickly. So that's been one thing that's impacted our ability to find some of the data center supply.

But we've also been looking at creative ways to work through that through increased customer prepayments on the upfront deposits on our contracts and also looking at various instruments in the market for a credit wrapper to give you a specific example. So that's how we're working through the current conditions.

Bill Papanastasiou: Appreciate that. That's really good color. And then just as a follow-up, with respect to the 7 megawatts under the right of first offer at metro Atlanta, can you just refresh the scenario there? When could that come online and be ready for service? Is there an expiry date attached to that ROFO? And is there enough demand today to sign that contract if it's possible to enter?

Michael Maniscalco: Yes. I mean, the demand still is extremely strong. The pipeline the sales team has and the customers that are calling them consistently asking for updates in our capacity in '27 is certainly not a limitation to our growth right now. It really is aligning the right supply. As to the specifics of the Atlanta property, I'll answer it to as much detail as I can give you top of mind. And then if we have follow-up information, we can certainly address that. But that one is an expansion that the owner of that data center is planning to do earmarked for 2027 delivery. That is at their discretion.

So as we get more information from that owner and operator on their ability and time lines to expand that, I'll have more specifics on the actual time line of RFS.

Operator: We have reached the end of the Q&A session. I will pass the call back to Michael Maniscalco for closing remarks.

Michael Maniscalco: I think through my commentary on the Q&A and my parting comments coming out of the earnings report, I really highlighted the points. I think the demand in the market is still really strong. Supply is continuing to be constrained, a lot of that by external factors. And I think those factors are changing pretty consistently. And we're, as I mentioned before, looking at creative ways to work through those in the near term. So really, the goal right now is to continue executing in the way we've been doing and bringing that capacity online in smaller pockets of power, aligning that with customer demand and continue to grow because that's what the customers are asking for.

So I appreciate everybody's time today. I appreciate all the questions, and have a great evening.

Operator: This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.

Should you buy stock in QumulusAI right now?

Before you buy stock in QumulusAI, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and QumulusAI wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $344,878!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,097,846!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 852% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 208% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of November 11, 2026.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Original Article on Source

Source: “AOL Money”